On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Knut Krueger <r...@krueger-family.de> wrote: [...] > In that case all lines would be thick and the actions Node 1 -> 2 ,Node 3 > -> 1,Node 2 -> 3 would be invisible, so I tried the narrow arrows to get > above the thick arrows in an other colour, but I found no rule to order them > that the are always on the top ... and the team was not satisfied with this > suggestion ;-)
Then make the arrows narrower. Or assign the arrow width logarithmically to you edge weight. I.e. something like E(g)$width <- log(E(g)$weight)+1 > The would prefer two parallel arrows one for each direction. You can set 'curved' to a value close to zero and then the arrows will be only a bit curved. > Its a very > long mathematical formula to display those arrows, depending on the radius > of the circles, and there is a ...hidden...error in the formula. I am a bit lost. What formula are we talking about? > So I tried to ask again if there is another solution. > > By the way: Do you know such arrow funtion: arrow(starting_point, angle, > length) ? I know igraph:::igraph.Arrows, there might be others as well, G. [...] -- Gabor Csardi <gabor.csa...@unil.ch> UNIL DGM ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
