>I am not sure what you mean. Of course you can plot it using different >layouts, e.g. with layout.reingold.tilford (after choosing the root >vertex in some way) and then it looks like a usual tree plot, but why >would that be any better?
I'd like to be able to distinguish between the nodes better. For example the image that I get looks like: http://www.nabble.com/file/p22954099/mst.gif mst.gif The tree nodes are just too close together to be able to read. I think the problem might be that some distances between the nodes are *much* smaller than other edges. The graph does not need to be directed, since the distance metric does not imply a direction. The most important part is just being able to see and differentiate between the nodes, and right now they seem to be all lumped together. How can I make it more readable? Thanks, ~josh -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Minimum-Spanning-Tree-tp22934813p22954099.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
