Duncan Murdoch <murd...@stats.uwo.ca> writes:
> On 4/1/2009 10:38 AM, Stavros Macrakis wrote:
>> NOTA BENE: This email is about `=`, the assignment operator (e.g. {a=1}
>> which is equivalent to { `=`(a,1) } ), not `=` the named-argument syntax
>> (e.g. f(a=1), which is equivalent to
>> eval(structure(quote(f(1)),names=c('','a'))).
>> As far as I can tell from the documentation, assignment with = is
>> precisely
>> equivalent to assignment with <-. Yet they call different primitives:
>
> The parser does treat them differently:
>
> > if (x <- 2) cat("assigned\n")
> assigned
> > if (x = 2) cat("assigned\n")
> Error: unexpected '=' in "if (x ="
>
> The ?"=" man page explains this:
>
> " The operator '<-' can be used anywhere,
> whereas the operator '=' is only allowed at the top level (e.g.,
> in the complete expression typed at the command prompt) or as one
> of the subexpressions in a braced list of expressions. "
>
> though the restriction on '=' seems to be described incorrectly:
>
> > if ((x = 2)) cat("assigned\n")
> assigned
>
> in which the assignment is in parentheses, not a braced list.
>
> As to the difference between the operations of the two primitives:
> see do_set in src/main/eval.c. The facility is there to distinguish
> between them, but it is not used.
10.4.2 of R-lang shows they differ in precedence
> x = y <- 1
> rm(x,y)
> x <- y = 1
Error in (x <- y) = 1 : object 'x' not found
as reflected in main/names.c (PREC_LEFT vs. PREC_EQ)
{"<-", do_set, 1, 100, -1, {PP_ASSIGN, PREC_LEFT,
1}},
{"=", do_set, 3, 100, -1, {PP_ASSIGN, PREC_EQ,
1}},
and include/Defn.h
PREC_LEFT = 1,
PREC_EQ = 2,
Martin
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
>
>>
>>> `=`
>> .Primitive("=")
>>> `<-`
>> .Primitive("<-")
>> (Perhaps these are different names for the same internal function?)
>> Also, the difference is preserved by the parser:
>>
>>> quote({a=b})
>> {
>> a = b
>> }
>>> quote({a<-b})
>> {
>> a <- b
>> }
>> even though in other cases the parser canonicalizes variant syntax,
>> e.g. ->
>> to <-:
>>
>>> quote({a->b})
>> {
>> b <- a
>> }
>>> `->`
>> Error: object "->" not found
>> Is there in fact some semantic difference between = and <- ?
>> If not, why do they use a different operator internally, each
>> calling a
>> different primitive?
>> Or is this all just accidental inconsistency resulting from the '=',
>> <-',
>> and '->' features being added at different times by different people working
>> off different stylistic conventions?
>> -s
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
--
Martin Morgan
Computational Biology / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N.
PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109
Location: Arnold Building M1 B861
Phone: (206) 667-2793
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
