Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote: > > are you sure it is not your explanation that is misleading?
on reflection, this should have been: 'are you sure your explanation is not misleading, too?' vQ ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
