Why don't you generate all the possible combinations using 'combn' and
then use that matrix to address your data:
> m <- matrix(1:25,5)
> indx <- combn(5, 3)
> indx
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10]
[1,] 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3
[2,] 2 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 4 4
[3,] 3 4 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5
> mxy <- m[cbind(indx[1,], indx[2,])]
>
>
> mxy
[1] 6 6 6 11 11 16 12 12 17 18
>
You can use each of the columns as x,y,z values and compute everything at once.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Nathan S. Watson-Haigh
<nathan.watson-ha...@csiro.au> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've written a function in R which takes a symmetrical matrix as input and
> processes all triplicate combinations of values from the matrix. The function
> looks something like:
>
> my_fun <- function(m) {
> if( nrow(mat) != ncol(mat) ) {
> stop("'m' must be a square matrix")
> }
>
> size <- nrow(m)
>
> for(x in 1:(size -2)) {
> for(y in (x+1):(size -1)) {
> xy <- m[x,y]
>
> for(z in (y+1):size ) {
> xz <- m[x,z]
> yz <- m[y,z]
>
> # do something with xy, xz, yz
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
> I'd like to speed this up since when size gets > a few thousand, I estimate it
> would take 3yrs to complete the "do something" task. I could implement the "do
> something" in C and have it called from within the nested for loops in R, but
> I
> think I should get better performance if I implement the for loops in C as
> well.
> As such, I'm trying to get my head around looping through matrix values when
> passed to .C()
>
> As I understand it, once a matrix (n x m in size) is passed to .C() it is seen
> as an unwrapped array of length n*m. Could someone help/guide me in
> implementing
> this?
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
>
> - --
> - --------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Nathan S. Watson-Haigh
> OCE Post Doctoral Fellow
> CSIRO Livestock Industries
> Queensland Bioscience Precinct
> St Lucia, QLD 4067
> Australia
>
> Tel: +61 (0)7 3214 2922
> Fax: +61 (0)7 3214 2900
> Web: http://www.csiro.au/people/Nathan.Watson-Haigh.html
> - --------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmSPM0ACgkQ9gTv6QYzVL5HbwCfRdA+7madbF5zuoKJRbuh4/tE
> sLwAn39h1JxNF6MjaF+AgxCq3XVe0X7T
> =KEDP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
--
Jim Holtman
Cincinnati, OH
+1 513 646 9390
What is the problem that you are trying to solve?
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
