Graham: OK. Just give me a few days and I will be sending you some simple RVM code lines. However, you have the Kernlab help with some nice examples  Best regards  Dr. Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi University of the Basque Country SPAIN
--- El vie, 9/1/09, Graham Williams <graham.willi...@togaware.com> escribió: De: Graham Williams <graham.willi...@togaware.com> Asunto: Re: [R] a first opinion on rattle Para: r-help@r-project.org Fecha: viernes, 9 enero, 2009 12:40 Received Fri 09 Jan 2009 7:49pm +1100 from Gabriel Ibarra: [...] > I have installed rattle and is pretty intuitive and > friendly. However, I miss some features of the original packages > which cannot be invoked from rattle. For example, 'randomForest' > package is??used but random??forests cannot be used in one of ??-in > my opinion- most powerful aspects like regression. The same about > SVM??. I would also say include RVM which the scientific literature > suggest is mugh powerful than SVM. > Anyway,??I must congratulate you and your team for providing the > scientific community with rattle. Thanks for the most kind feedback Gabriel. It is appreciated. I am always open to suggestions. I should turn the randomForest regression option on. Thanks for suggesting that. RVM from kernlab is in the todo list now. Do you have some simple examples using rvm for regression? I should have a look to get that into Rattle. Help (i.e., code or just code examples) is always welcome :-) Thanks, Graham ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
