3 comments:
1. Quoting the last lines of this message:
"PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code."
Otherwise we cannot help anyway.
2. This is not the BUGS mailing list.
3. I do prefer BRugs, the R package that is based on OpenBUGS, because
it is closer to BUGS, more flexible, sometimes easier to debug, ....
Best wishes,
Uwe Ligges
Anny Huang wrote:
Hi all,
I did some analysis using package R2WinBUGS to call WinBUGS. I set the
iterations to 50000 (fairly a large number, I think), but after the program
was done, the effective posterior samples contained only 7 draws. I don't
know why.
By the way, I checked posterior sample size by using bugsobj$n.sims. And,
for my previous practice with WinBUGS/R2WinBUGS, no such strange thing
happend. Does anybody have some idea on what might be wrong with my model or
whatever part in this program? Appreciate it.
Anny
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
