Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > I think reproducible is the correct word and its meaning should be clear from > both its conventional meaning, see link, and the context in which its used: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducibility > > It is surprising how many posters disregard this basic requirement for a post, > clearly stated at the bottom of each message to r-help. > >
well, the foot > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > says 'reproducible code', but code is what you really want to get, not to reproduce ;) vQ ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
