Liviu Andronic <landronimirc <at> gmail.com> writes: > The other day I stumbled on this article, "A critique of R and S-PLUS" > [1], and got curious on whether the points outlined are (still) valid. > The article is quite old, dating 2004, but was updated several times.
http://www.nabble.com/An-%22R-is-slow%22-article-to14714237.html#a14715310 To be fair, this thread was quoted in that article. Dieter ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
