On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Auguie, Baptiste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear list and Hadley, > > The new plyr package seems to provide a clean and consistent way to apply a > function on several arguments. However, I don't understand why the following > example does not work like the standard mapply, > > library(plyr) > df <- data.frame(a=1:10 , b=1:10) > > foo1 <- function(a, b, cc=0, d=0){ > a + b + cc + d > } > > mdply(df, foo1, cc=1) # fine > > mdply(df, foo1, d=1) # fails > mdply(df, foo1, cc=1, d=2) # fails
Unfortunately this bug is R's partial name matching: d = 2 -> data. = 2. You should be able to fix this by manually specifying mdply(data. = df, foo1, cc=1, d=2) but there are some bugs in the current version that prevent this from happening. I've fixed this in the development version, available from http://github.com/hadley/plyr (click the download link) However, the whole point of plyr is that you should have to think about this kind of thing, so I'll revisit my naming scheme - probably to use . prefixes instead of suffixes. Hadley -- http://had.co.nz/ ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.