On Sun, 14 Sep 2008, roberto toro wrote:

Thanks for answering Mark!

I tried with the coding of the interaction you suggested:

tfac<-with(vlt,interaction(Lobe,Tissue,drop=T))
mod<-lme(Volume~Sex*Lobe*Tissue,random=~1|Subject/tfac,data=vlt)

But is it normal that the DF are 2303? DF is 2303 even for the estimate of
LobeO that has only 662 values (331 for Tissue=white and 331 for
Tissue=grey). I'm not sure either that Sex, Lobe and Tissue are correctly
handled.... why are there different estimates called Sex:LobeO, Sex:LobeP,
etc, and not just Sex:Lobe as with aov()?. Why there's Tissuew, but not
Sex1, for example?

lme is basically doing a regression, not an ANOVA as you're used to it. You
may want anova(mod) instead of summary(mod) to see aggregated effects. Or,
you could define contrasts among your levels by assigning to
contrasts(vlt$Lobe), for example.

Also, in the above model, you're only looking at modeling a separate average
volume for each subject-within-tfac; if I read you correctly, you actually
want to model a lobe and tissue effect for each subject for each tfac, in
which case you would want something like what was in my last post.

--Adam


Thanks again!
roberto

ps1. How would you code this with lmer()?
ps2. this is part of the output of mod<-lme:
summary(mod)
Linear mixed-effects model fit by REML
Data: vlt
      AIC      BIC    logLik
 57528.35 57639.98 -28745.17

Random effects:
Formula: ~1 | Subject
       (Intercept)
StdDev:    11294.65

Formula: ~1 | tfac %in% Subject
       (Intercept) Residual
StdDev:    10569.03 4587.472

Fixed effects: Volume ~ Sex * Lobe * Tissue
                      Value Std.Error   DF    t-value p-value
(Intercept)        245224.61  1511.124 2303  162.27963  0.0000
Sex                  2800.01  1866.312  329    1.50029  0.1345
LobeO             -180794.83  1526.084 2303 -118.46975  0.0000
LobeP             -131609.27  1526.084 2303  -86.23984  0.0000
LobeT              -73189.97  1526.084 2303  -47.95932  0.0000
Tissuew            -72461.05  1526.084 2303  -47.48168  0.0000
Sex:LobeO            -663.27  1884.789 2303   -0.35191  0.7249
Sex:LobeP           -2146.08  1884.789 2303   -1.13863  0.2550
Sex:LobeT            1379.49  1884.789 2303    0.73191  0.4643
Sex:Tissuew          5387.65  1884.789 2303    2.85849  0.0043
LobeO:Tissuew       43296.99  2158.209 2303   20.06154  0.0000
LobeP:Tissuew       50952.21  2158.209 2303   23.60856  0.0000
LobeT:Tissuew      -15959.31  2158.209 2303   -7.39470  0.0000
Sex:LobeO:Tissuew   -5228.66  2665.494 2303   -1.96161  0.0499
Sex:LobeP:Tissuew   -1482.83  2665.494 2303   -0.55631  0.5781
Sex:LobeT:Tissuew   -6037.49  2665.494 2303   -2.26506  0.0236

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to