sounds great. there are often times I'd like to use reshape on data frames of hundreds of thousands or millions of rows, but I have found that it is just too slow at this point to be convenient.
thanks again for everything, Mike hadley wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Michael Frumin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> thanks, that workaround, well, works! >> >> what are you working on with the rewrite? just efficiency? or major >> changes in functionality/interface? > > I've come up with a strategy that makes reshape _much_ faster - 10-20x > for pure reshaping and 3-5x for aggregating - while reducing the > amount of code and making it much easier to understand how it works. > I'm also fixing a few small deficiencies in functionality that have > been bugging me for a while. The interface will remain basically the > same. > > Hadley > > > -- > http://had.co.nz/ > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/bug-in-%27margins%27-behavior-in-reshape---cast-tp18737649p18753788.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
