Gad Abraham wrote:
If your legal department is still concerned, have them look at the
license in Java. It most likely is GPL (unless you have a special
commercial version of Java installed) and thus makes any Java program
you create subject to the GPL in Java due to the JIT compiler used in
Java. If your legal department does not have a problem with Java,
then they should not have a problem with R.
This is conflating two issues, the license of the compiler/interpreter,
and the license of the code you wrote in that language.
From http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/FAQ_Update:
``Can I use GPL-covered editors such as GNU Emacs to develop non-free
programs? Can I use GPL-covered tools such as GCC to compile them?
Yes, because the copyright on the editors and tools does not cover the
code you write. Using them does not place any restrictions, legally, on
the license you use for your code.
Some programs copy parts of themselves into the output for technical
reasons--for example, Bison copies a standard parser program into its
output file. In such cases, the copied text in the output is covered by
the same license that covers it in the source code. Meanwhile, the part
of the output which is derived from the program's input inherits the
copyright status of the input.
As it happens, Bison can also be used to develop non-free programs. This
is because we decided to explicitly permit the use of the Bison standard
parser program in Bison output files without restriction. We made the
decision because there were other tools comparable to Bison which
already permitted use for non-free programs.''
Replying to myself, Java is a particularly bad example here, because
under the standard GPL v2, inheritance is considered derivative work, so
every time you instantiate any object (thus inheriting from Object) and
the Object class is GPL, then your code is GPL. For v2, there is the
version of the GPL with the Classpath exception
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/faq/faq.html#faq2_1, that
specifically allows for that.
This may have implications for object oriented R, as if I choose to
extend the Matrix class, for example, then it's considered derivative
work and hence under the GPL.
--
Gad Abraham
Dept. CSSE and NICTA
The University of Melbourne
Parkville 3010, Victoria, Australia
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.csse.unimelb.edu.au/~gabraham
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
