A statistical (off-topic!) point to consider: when the GLM was fitted, you 
conditioned on x and let y be the random variable. Therefore the model supports 
predictions of y conditional on x. You’re now seeking to make predictions of x 
conditional on y. That’s not the same thing, even in OLS.

It might not matter for your application but it’s probably worth thinking 
about. Simulation experiments might shed some light on that.

Cheers, Andrew

--
Andrew Robinson
Chief Executive Officer, CEBRA and Professor of Biosecurity,
School/s of BioSciences and Mathematics & Statistics
University of Melbourne, VIC 3010 Australia
Tel: (+61) 0403 138 955
Email: a...@unimelb.edu.au
Website: https://researchers.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~apro@unimelb/

I acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the land I inhabit, and pay my respects 
to their Elders.
On 16 Apr 2025 at 1:01 AM +1000, Gregg Powell via R-help 
<r-help@r-project.org<mailto:r-help@r-project.org>>, wrote:


Take a look at this Luigi...


# The model is: logit(p) = β₀ + β₁*Cycles
# Where p is the probability (or normalized value in your case)

# The inverse function would be: Cycles = (logit⁻¹(p) - β₀)/β₁
# Where logit⁻¹ is the inverse logit function (also called the expit >function)

# Extract coefficients from your model
intercept <- coef(b_model)[1]
slope <- coef(b_model)[2]

# Define the inverse function
inverse_predict <- function(p) {
# p is the probability or normalized value you want to find the >cycles for
# Inverse logit: log(p/(1-p)) which is the logit function
logit_p <- log(p/(1-p))




# Solve for Cycles: (logit(p) - intercept)/slope
cycles <- (logit_p - intercept)/slope




return(cycles)
}

# Example: What cycle would give a normalized value of 0.5?
inverse_predict(0.5)



This function takes a probability (normalized value between 0 and 1) and 
returns the cycle value that would produce this probability according to your 
model.
Also:
This works because GLM with binomial family uses the logit link function by 
default
The inverse function will return values outside your original data range if 
needed
This won't work for p=0 or p=1 exactly (you'd get -Inf or Inf), so you might 
want to add checks

All the best,
Gregg









On Tuesday, April 15th, 2025 at 5:57 AM, Luigi Marongiu 
<marongiu.lu...@gmail.com> wrote:








I have fitted a glm model to some data; how can I find the inverse
function of this model? Since I don't know the y=f(x) implemented by
glm (this works under the hood), I can't define a f⁻¹(y).
Is there an R function that can find the inverse of a glm model?
Thank you.




The working example is:
`V = c(120.64, 66.14, 34.87, 27.11, 8.87, -5.8, 4.52, -7.16, -17.39, -14.29, 
-20.26, -14.99, -21.05, -20.64, -8.03, -21.56, -1.28, 15.01, 75.26, 191.76, 
455.09, 985.96, 1825.59, 2908.08, 3993.18, 5059.94, 6071.93, 6986.32, 7796.01, 
8502.25, 9111.46, 9638.01, 10077.19, 10452.02, 10751.81, 11017.49, 11240.37, 
11427.47, 11570.07, 11684.96, 11781.77, 11863.35, 11927.44, 11980.81, 12021.88, 
12058.35, 12100.63, 12133.57, 12148.89, 12137.09) df = data.frame(Cycles = 
1:35, Values = V[1:35]) M = max(df$Values) df$Norm = df$Values/M 
df$Norm[df$Norm<0] = 0 b_model = glm(Norm ~ Cycles, data=df, family=binomial) 
plot(Norm ~ Cycles, df, main="Normalized view", xlab=expression(bold("Time")), 
ylab=expression(bold("Signal (normalized)")), type="p", col="cyan") 
lines(b_model$fitted.values ~ df$Cycles, col="blue", lwd=2)`




______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide https://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide https://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to