We were not told this was a matrix, rather a 'dataset'.
If it is matrix, logical indexing via is.na(x) is pretty good, although it
will create an index equal in size to the dataset (but logical).
If 'dataset' means a data frame, you will use less memory using a for()
loop over columns, e.g.
for(i in seq_along(x)) x[[i]][is.na(x[[i]])] <- 0
and I suspect this approach would also use less memory for a matrix.
A quick check with 40 columns of 0.5m rows showed that Jim's approach
needed 860Mb, whereas mine needed 460Mb (and the object is 150Mb)
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, jim holtman wrote:
If your matrix is 835353x86, then if it is numeric, then it will take
about 550MB for a single copy. You should therefore have at least 2GB
(so you can have a couple of copies as part of some processing) of
real memory on your system. If you want to replace NAs with zero,
then this is how you might do it with 'vectorization':
x
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
[1,] 1 NA NA 2 1 2
[2,] 2 2 2 NA 2 2
[3,] 2 2 NA NA 1 2
[4,] NA 1 2 1 2 1
[5,] 1 1 NA 2 NA NA
[6,] NA 1 NA 1 2 NA
x[is.na(x)] <- 0
x
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6]
[1,] 1 0 0 2 1 2
[2,] 2 2 2 0 2 2
[3,] 2 2 0 0 1 2
[4,] 0 1 2 1 2 1
[5,] 1 1 0 2 0 0
[6,] 0 1 0 1 2 0
Maybe you should read the Intro To R to understand how vectorization works.
Same way with your last loop:
x[is.na(x[,4]), 4] <- 0
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Denise Xifara
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear All and Mark,
Given a dataset that I have called dat, I was hoping to speed up the
following loop:
for(i in 1:835353){
for(j in 1:86){
if (is.na(dat[i,j])==TRUE){dat[i,j]<-0 }}}
Actually I am also having a memory problem. I get the following:
Error: cannot allocate vector of size 3.2 Mb
In addition: Warning messages:
1: In dat[i, j] <- 0 :
Reached total allocation of 1535Mb: see help(memory.size)
2: In dat[i, j] <- 0 :
Reached total allocation of 1535Mb: see help(memory.size)
3: In dat[i, j] <- 0 :
Reached total allocation of 1535Mb: see help(memory.size)
4: In dat[i, j] <- 0 :
Reached total allocation of 1535Mb: see help(memory.size)
If I try and apply the loop just to a particular column, rather than the
whole dataset, so that I dont have the memory problem, ie
for(i in 1:835353){
if (is.na(dat[i,4])==TRUE){dat[i,4]<-0 }}
it takes ridiculously long to process, so I was hoping that there would be a
quicker way to do this.
Thank you all very much for the help,
Denise
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
--
Jim Holtman
Cincinnati, OH
+1 513 646 9390
What is the problem you are trying to solve?
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
--
Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
