Unlikely See here:
https://www.r-bloggers.com/2017/08/how-to-make-best-use-of-the-byte-compiler-in-r/ Byte code compilation should be automatic in both cases, as I understand it. Of course, I could be wrong due to special features of parallel programming, etc. A reprex might be helpful here. Cheers, Bert On Wed, Jul 6, 2022, 7:29 PM akshay kulkarni <akshay...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Dear members, > I am using pbmclapply, the progress bar version > of mclapply, from the parallel package. The point is, pbmclapply is three > times faster than mclapply, and I think the most probable reason would be > that pbmclapply is byte code compiled (I can think of no other reason). > > I know the cmpfun function from compiler package. If I do: > > > cmpfun(mclapply) > > will the job be done? The point is mclapply may look for other functions > in the parallel package. So I have to compile the whole package right? How > do you do that? or in general, how do you byte code compile a whole package? > > Thanking you, > Yours sincerely, > AKSHAY M KULKARNI > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
