Dear Jeff,
Thank you for the hint. I had read about it. While it is quite useful, I
doubt that any of my colleagues would understand the construct...
Waiting for the placeholder :)
Best,
Ivan
--
Dr. Ivan Calandra
Imaging lab
RGZM - MONREPOS Archaeological Research Centre
Schloss Monrepos
56567 Neuwied, Germany
+49 (0) 2631 9772-243
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ivan_Calandra
On 09/03/2022 18:21, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
Not currently, but you can emulate it with the anonymous function shorthand:
(\(.) expression_using_dot ))()
e.g.
https://i.reddit.com/r/rstats/comments/nkiavh/is_base_r_pipe_faster_than_dplyr/
On March 9, 2022 4:57:36 AM PST, Ivan Calandra <ivan.calan...@rgzm.de> wrote:
Dear useRs,
When the implementation of the native pipe was announced (e.g.
https://www.r-bloggers.com/2021/05/the-new-r-pipe/), there was no
placeholder similar to the dot in magrittr.
Has it changed? Is there now a placeholder? There is no mention of it in
the help page for "|>" so I guess not, but maybe someone on the list
knows more about future developments?
Thank you!
Ivan
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
