Dear R users,
is the following OK?
> max(NA, NaN)
[1] NA
> max(NaN, NA)
[1] NA
> pmax(NaN, NA)
[1] NA
> pmax(NA, NaN)
[1] NaN
...or is it a bug? Documentation says that NA has a higher priority over
NaN.
Best regards, Michal Burda
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
