> On Aug 11, 2017, at 7:56 AM, Dennis F. Kahlbaum <kb...@umich.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi Robert:
> 
> Thanks for your response, as well.
> 
> I'm sorry. As you've discovered, I made some capitalization errors when 
> posting my R code.  The actual R code does use "lme", "data", and "random".
> 
> The dataframe is indeed named "emiss" and each item in the formula is a 
> column in the dataframe. I used the following R code to read in the 
> comma-delimited file (first line contains headings):
> 
>    emiss <- read.table("data.csv", header=TRUE, sep=",") # NA for missing 
> data (default)
> 
> A review of the dataframe "emiss" shows that all items, except "STUDY", 
> "VEHICLE" and "NEW", are of type "num". The items "STUDY", "VEHICLE", and 
> "NEW" are of type "factor".
> 
> I will work on creating some "fake data". However, since I don't have SAS 
> v6.12 anymore, I can't provide the so-called "correct results".
> 
> As for the R hang, your wording is correct: "R gets caught in a processing 
> loop that produces no errors or warnings", even after 15 minutes on an 8-core 
> Mac Pro.  As I recall, the SAS code produced an answer in 15 seconds or less 
> on a single core Mac II back in 1999.

You really should start over. Compose a correct version of code and data and 
resubmit to the place this questions _should_ have gone in the first place: the 
R-SIG-Mixed-models mailing list (correct spelling and link should be on the 
listinfo page.)


> 
> Thanks again!
> 
> --Dennis
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/11/17 9:27 AM, Robert Baer wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/10/2017 8:34 AM, Dennis F. Kahlbaum wrote:
>>> -- snip --
>> I don't have real help, but I'll remind you that R is case sensitive, and it 
>> looks like that will be at least one problem in the solution your are 
>> working on below:
>> lme not LME
>> data not DATA
>> random = RANDOM
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> The R code I've devised for the PROC MIXED statement is shown below:
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> FitTHC <- LME(ln_thc ~ rv + t5 + t9 + ar + ol + ox + su + bz,
>>>          DATA = emiss,
>>>          RANDOM = ??????? )
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> As indicated, the problem I'm having is in constructing the equivalent code 
>>> for the RANDOM and any remaining settings. I've tried
>>> 
>>> RANDOM = ~1 + rv + t5 + t9 + ar + ol + ox + su + bz | new)
>>> 
>>> but R hangs 
>> Are the items in your random formula columns in a dataframe named emiss?  Do 
>> they have data types?  Even if the data are proprietary some fake data can 
>> make the problem more concrete.
>> You are saying "gets caught in a processing loop that produces no errors or 
>> warnings"???
>> 
>>> and never produces a result. Therefore, what is the equivalent code for the 
>>> SAS RANDOM?
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>>> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>> 
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

David Winsemius
Alameda, CA, USA

'Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.'   
-Gehm's Corollary to Clarke's Third Law

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to