Better to post on the mixed models list, r-sig-mixed-models rather than here.
And post in plain text,not html. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Ahreum Maeng <amaengw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to run the following model: > > domi ~ type*ratio+((1|id)+(0+type|id)+(1|face_id)+(1|car_id)) > > My question is whether the data coding for "face_id" and "car_id" variables > is correct. > As you see on the following sample data structure, "type" is repeated > measure where 1=car, 0=face. Thus, I coded "face_id" as "0" when the type > is 1 (car) and coded "car_id" as "0" when type is 0 (face). Would it be a > right way to deal with this repeated measure issue? > > id type face_id car_id ratio domi > 1 1 0 1 high 3.14 > 2 1 0 2 medi 4.67 > 3 1 0 3 low 4.23 > 4 1 0 4 low 7 > 1 0 1 0 high 3.00 > 2 0 2 0 medi 4.77 > 3 0 3 0 low 4.25 > 4 0 4 0 low 7.12 > > T > hank you so much for your help in advance and I look forward to hearing > from you. > > Thanks, > Ahreum > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
