otherwise explain it as unexplained "random variable"/ "residual error" :)
Santosh On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Rolf Turner <r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz> wrote: > > On 19/04/17 20:01, peter dalgaard wrote: > > I believe that the list maintainer is hunting this down. As I >> understood it, it was more due to incompetence than to actual malice. >> > > Years ago I ran across an aphorism that very much appealed to me: "Never > attribute to malice that which may be adequately explained by stupidity." > > More recently I saw the same sentiment, expressed only slightly > differently, in someone's signature file --- can't remember whose. > > cheers, > > Rolf > > > -- > Technical Editor ANZJS > Department of Statistics > University of Auckland > Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276 > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posti > ng-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
