Sorry. You may get private replies, but this *is* way OT on this list.
Try stats.stackexchange.com instead for statistical queries. Or,
better yet, find local consulting help. Non-random dropouts are a
difficult issue.

Cheers,
Bert
Bert Gunter

"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along
and sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip )


On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Damjan Krstajic <dkrsta...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All.
>
>
> Apologies for posting a question regarding survival analysis, and not R, to 
> the R-help list. In the past I received the best advices from the R community.
>
>
> The random censorship model (the censoring times independent of the failure 
> times and vice versa) is one of the fundamental assumptions in the survival 
> analysis. In the medical studies we have random entry to study and study end 
> which is a censoring mechanism independent of the failure times. However, in 
> reality we may have dropout subjects, lost to follow-up, which are censored 
> by a different mechanism which may not be independent of the failure times. 
> The inclusion of dropout subjects in the survival analysis may break the 
> random censorship model and include bias in our estimates of survival with 
> KM. I have studied papers on this subject (e.g. double sampling, copula 
> approach for dependent censoring), but I have not found any research paper 
> which examines the removal of dropout subjects from the survival analysis.
>
>
> I am alone in my research and would be grateful to hear thoughts on this 
> subject. Thank you in advance and apologies for using the R-help list for my 
> research question.
>
>
> DK
>
>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to