Hi Jeff, It works on well on a dataset with 100000 rows and I figure it will 
work well with the “real” dataset. You’ve been of great help and I am starting 
to make headway. 

It creates a new dataframe (result), as shown below that doesn’t quite have the 
result as I would want it.

ID      admin_period    start   end     ddays
J1/3    1       5/11/07 8/13/07 94
J1/3    2       8/13/07 11/12/07        91
J1/3    3       11/12/07        2/4/08             84
J1/3    4       2/4/08              5/5/08                  91
J1/3    5       5/5/08               5/4/09            364
J1/3    6       5/4/09               5/17/10    378
J1/3    7       5/17/10 5/16/11 364
J10/1   1       5/11/07 8/13/07 94
J10/1   2       8/13/07 11/12/07        91
J10/1   3       11/12/07        2/4/08              84
J10/1   4       2/4/08                5/5/08    91
J10/1   5       5/5/08                5/8/09    368
J10/1   6       5/8/09               5/17/10    374
J10/1   7       5/17/10 5/16/11 364
J102/1  1       5/15/07 8/15/07 92
J102/1  2       8/15/07 11/13/07        90
J102/1  3       11/13/07        2/5/08             84
J102/1  4       2/5/08                5/6/08    91
J102/1  5       5/6/08                5/5/09    364
J102/1  6       5/5/09                5/19/10   379

My supervisor doesn’t want me to create a new dataset, she’s afraid I might 
lose some data…I cannot fight that.

Like you mentioned earlier, I might be mixing up things which I think is what 
you alluded to earlier.

After consultation with my supervisor, this is what we’ve agreed. For every 
individual, given the start and end date, create a new column (say, diff_days) 
and for every row that falls within the range of start and end_date, get the 
difference between the date in that row and start date and add it to the 
diff_days column. Below is an example of the result. As it can be seen 
5/11/2007 is the start while 2/4/2008 is the end. The diff_days has been 
populated excluding the end date and that is because that is the start of the 
study in 2008 that will continue into 2009 and thus from 2/4/2008, I should 
compute diff_days till 2009 and so no (I hope this makes sense).

ID      date    drug_admin      year    month   diff_days
R1/3    5/11/2007       Y       2007    5       0
R1/3    5/16/2007               2007    5       6
R1/3    5/22/2007               2007    5       11
R1/3    5/28/2007               2007    5       17
R1/3    1/14/2008               2008    1       248
R1/3    1/21/2008               2008    1       255
R1/3    1/28/2008               2008    1       263
R1/3    2/4/2008        Y       2008    2       


Regards
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Wame 
 

On 7/3/16, 10:09 PM, "Jeff Newmiller" <jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:

Typo on the second line

result <- (   result0 
          %>% select( -admin_period1 )
          %>% inner_join( result0 %>% select( ID, admin_period1, end=start )
                       , by = c( ID="ID", admin_period ="admin_period1" )
                        )
          %>% mutate( ddays = end - start )
          )
-- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.

On July 3, 2016 11:55:14 AM PDT, Kevin Wamae <kwa...@kemri-wellcome.org> wrote:
>Hi Jeff, “likes its Excel”, I don’t follow. Pardon me for any mix up.
>
>Thanks for the code.  After running it, this is the error I get.
>
>Error: cannot join on columns 'admin_period' x 'admin_period1': index
>out of bounds
>
>Regards
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Kevin Wame | Ph.D. Student (IDeAL)
>KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Collaborative Research Programme
>Centre for Geographic Medicine Research
>P.O. Box 230-80108, Kilifi, Kenya
> 
>
>On 7/3/16, 9:34 PM, "Jeff Newmiller" <jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
>
>I still get the impression from your mixing of information types that
>you are thinking like this is Excel.
>
>Perhaps something like
>
>drug_study$admin_period  <- ave( "Y" == drug_study$drug_admin,
>drug_study$ID, FUN=cumsum )
>library(dplyr)
>result0 <- (   drug_study
>          %>% filter( 0 != admin_period )
>          %>% group_by( ID, admin_period )
>          %>% summarise( start = min( date ) )
>          %>% mutate( admin_period1 = admin_period -1 )
>          )
>result <- (   result0 
>          %>% select( -admin_period )
>     %>% inner_join( result0 %>% select( ID, admin_period1, end=start )
>                     , by = c( ID="ID", admin_period ="admin_period1" )
>                        )
>          %>% mutate( ddays = end - start )
>          )
>-- 
>Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
>
>On July 3, 2016 10:24:51 AM PDT, Kevin Wamae
><kwa...@kemri-wellcome.org> wrote:
>>HI Jeff, it’s been an uphill task working with the dataset and I am
>not
>>the first to complain. Nonetheless, data-cleaning is ongoing and since
>>I cannot wait for that to get done, I decided to make the most of what
>>the dataset looks like at this time. It appears the process may take a
>>while.
>>
>>Thanks for the script. From the output, I noticed that “result”
>>contains the first and last date for each of the individuals and not
>>taking into account the variable “drug-admin”. 
>>
>>ID        start               end
>>J1/3      1/5/09      12/25/10
>>R1/3      1/4/07      12/15/08
>>R10/1     1/4/07      3/5/12
>>
>>My aim is to pick the date, for example in 2007, where drug-admin ==
>>“Y” as my start and the date in the subsequent year (2008 in this
>case)
>>where drug-admin == “Y” as my end. Then, I should populate the
>variable
>>“study_id” with “start” up to the entry just above the one whose date
>>matches “end”, as the output below shows (I hope its structure is
>>maintained as I have copied it from R-Studio). The goal for now is to
>>then get difference in days between “date” and “study_id” and still
>get
>>to keep that column for “study_id” as I might use it later.
>>
>>From the output, it can be seen that for this individual, the dates
>run
>>from 2007 to 2008. However, for some individuals, the dates run from
>>2008-2009, 2009-2010 and so on. Therefore, I need to make the script
>>deal with all the years as the dates range from 2001-2016
>>
>>ID    date    drug_admin      year    month   study_id
>>R1/3  5/11/07 Y       2007    5       5/11/07
>>R1/3  5/16/07         2007    5       5/11/07
>>R1/3  5/22/07         2007    5       5/11/07
>>R1/3  5/28/07         2007    5       5/11/07
>>R1/3  6/5/07                  2007    6       5/11/07
>>R1/3  6/11/07         2007    6       5/11/07
>>R1/3  6/18/07         2007    6       5/11/07
>>R1/3  6/25/07         2007    6       5/11/07
>>R1/3  7/2/07                  2007    7       5/11/07
>>R1/3  7/16/07         2007    7       5/11/07
>>R1/3  7/29/07         2007    7       5/11/07
>>R1/3  8/2/07                  2007    8       5/11/07
>>R1/3  8/7/07                  2007    8       5/11/07
>>R1/3  8/13/07         2007    8       5/11/07
>>R1/3  9/18/07         2007    9       5/11/07
>>R1/3  9/24/07         2007    9       5/11/07
>>R1/3  10/6/07         2007    10      5/11/07
>>R1/3  10/8/07         2007    10      5/11/07
>>R1/3  10/15/07                2007    10      5/11/07
>>R1/3  10/22/07                2007    10      5/11/07
>>R1/3  10/29/07                2007    10      5/11/07
>>R1/3  11/8/07         2007    11      5/11/07
>>R1/3  11/12/07                2007    11      5/11/07
>>R1/3  11/19/07                2007    11      5/11/07
>>R1/3  11/29/07                2007    11      5/11/07
>>R1/3  12/6/07         2007    12      5/11/07
>>R1/3  12/10/07                2007    12      5/11/07
>>R1/3  12/21/07                2007    12      5/11/07
>>R1/3  1/7/08                  2008    1       5/11/07
>>R1/3  1/14/08         2008    1       5/11/07
>>R1/3  1/21/08         2008    1       5/11/07
>>R1/3  1/28/08         2008    1       5/11/07
>>R1/3  2/4/08          Y       2008    2       
>>
>>
>>Regards
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Kevin Wame 
>>
>>###############################################################
>>
>>###############################################################
>>
>>
>>
>>On 7/3/16, 7:05 PM, "Jeff Newmiller" <jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
>>
>>result <- setNames( data.frame( aggregate( date~ID, data=drug_study,
>>FUN=min ),  aggregate( date~ID, data=drug_study, FUN=max )[2] ), c(
>>"ID", "start", "end" ) )
>>
>>
>>______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>This e-mail contains information which is confidential. It is intended
>>only for the use of the named recipient. If you have received this
>>e-mail in error, please let us know by replying to the sender, and
>>immediately delete it from your system.  Please note, that in these
>>circumstances, the use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this
>>information is strictly prohibited. KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Programme
>>cannot accept any responsibility for the  accuracy or completeness of
>>this message as it has been transmitted over a public network.
>Although
>>the Programme has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses
>are
>>present in emails, it cannot accept responsibility for any loss or
>>damage arising from the use of the email or attachments. Any views
>>expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
>>where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
>>KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Programme.
>>______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>This e-mail contains information which is confidential. It is intended
>only for the use of the named recipient. If you have received this
>e-mail in error, please let us know by replying to the sender, and
>immediately delete it from your system.  Please note, that in these
>circumstances, the use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this
>information is strictly prohibited. KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Programme
>cannot accept any responsibility for the  accuracy or completeness of
>this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. Although
>the Programme has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are
>present in emails, it cannot accept responsibility for any loss or
>damage arising from the use of the email or attachments. Any views
>expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
>where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
>KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Programme.
>______________________________________________________________________




______________________________________________________________________

This e-mail contains information which is confidential. It is intended only for 
the use of the named recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error, 
please let us know by replying to the sender, and immediately delete it from 
your system.  Please note, that in these circumstances, the use, disclosure, 
distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. 
KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Programme cannot accept any responsibility for the  
accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a 
public network. Although the Programme has taken reasonable precautions to 
ensure no viruses are present in emails, it cannot accept responsibility for 
any loss or damage arising from the use of the email or attachments. Any views 
expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the 
sender specifically states them to be the views of KEMRI-Wellcome Trust 
Programme.
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to