Isn't this why NULL is different than NA?
Alternatively, what about using a data frame with no rows?
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On April 22, 2016 1:38:57 PM PDT, "Boylan, Ross" <ross.boy...@ucsf.edu> wrote:
>It seems that if an S4 class has no slots it can't be instantiated
>because it is assumed to be virtual. Is there a way around this other
>than adding a do-nothing slot? A singleton would be OK, though is not
>essential.
>
>Problem:
>EmptyFitResult <- setClass("EmptyFitResult",
>representation=representation())
># also tried it without the second argument. same result.
> > e <- EmptyFitResult()
> Error in new("EmptyFitResult", ...) :
> trying to generate an object from a virtual class ("EmptyFitResult")
>
>This in R 3.1.1.
>
>Context:
>I fit simulated data; in some simulations none survive to the second
>stage of fitting. So I just need a way to record that this happened,
>in a way that integrates with my other non-null results.
>
>Thanks.
>Ross Boylan
>
>______________________________________________
>R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>PLEASE do read the posting guide
>http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
