Hi Harold,

Thank you for your input. I was not very clear. I wanted to compare the 
sigma2_A’s from the same model fitted to two different data sets. The same for 
sigma2_e’s. The motivation is when I did the same experiment at two different 
times, whether the variance due to A (sigma2_A) is bigger at one time versus 
another. The same for sigma2_e, whether the residual variance is bigger for one 
experiment versus another.

Thanks,
Wen

> On Feb 16, 2016, at 12:40 PM, Doran, Harold <hdo...@air.org> wrote:
> 
> (adding R mixed group). You actually do not want to do this test, and there 
> is no "shrinkage" here on these variances. First, there are conditional 
> variances and marginal variances in the mixed model. What you are have below 
> as "A" is the marginal variances of the random effects and there is no 
> shrinkage on these, per se.
> 
> The conditional means of the random effects have shrinkage and each 
> conditional mean (or BLUP) has a conditional variance. 
> 
> Now, it seems very odd to want to compare the variance between A and then 
> what you have as sigma2_e, which is presumably the residual variance. These 
> are variances of two completely different things, so a test comparing them 
> seems strange, though I suppose some theoretical reason could exists 
> justifying it, I cannot imagine one though. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: R-help [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Wen Huang
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 10:57 AM
> To: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: [R] Comparing variance components
> 
> Dear R-help members,
> 
> Say I have two data sets collected at different times with the same design. I 
> fit a mixed model using in R using lmer
> 
> lmer(y ~ (1|A))
> 
> to these data sets and get two estimates of sigma2_A and sigma2_e
> 
> What would be a good way to compare sigma2_A and sigma2_e for these two data 
> sets and obtain a P value for the hypothesis that sigma2_A1 = sigma2_A2? 
> There is obvious shrinkage on these estimates, should I be worried about the 
> differential levels of shrinkage on these estimates and how to account for 
> that?
> 
> Thank you for your thoughts and inputs!
> 
> 
> 
>       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see 
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to