+1 I, originally, read it as a stringent criticism of the first paper. John Kane Kingston ON Canada
> -----Original Message----- > From: r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz > Sent: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:12:43 +1200 > To: cfly...@ncsu.edu > Subject: Re: [R] VIF threshold implying multicollinearity > > > On 27/07/15 13:36, Collin Lynch wrote: > >> The following sources discuss the issues generally and may be a goof >> pointer to the literature ... > > <SNIP> > > I think that the foregoing merits fortune status! :-) > > cheers, > > Rolf > > -- > Technical Editor ANZJS > Department of Statistics > University of Auckland > Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276 > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. ____________________________________________________________ FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family! Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more! ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
