Dear Rolf, There isn't any offending content. I think it's related to the styles used on the mail. Thanks for helping. Maram
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 9, 2015, at 11:36 AM, Rolf Turner <r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz> wrote: > > >> On 09/07/15 19:49, Maram Salem wrote: >> >> Sorry I mean NOT explicitly allowed > > You probably mean "explicitly NOT allowed". The order of the words makes a > substantial difference to the meaning. > >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Jul 9, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Maram Salem <marammagdysa...@gmx.com> wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> I need help with posting to the list. Whenever i post any message, i get >>> this reply : the message content was explicitly allowed. >>> Any help please? >>> Thanks a lot. > > You have just successfully posted two messages to the list. > > So think about the error message that you got. It told you that the content > of your (rejected) message was disallowed. What was it about that content > that would make the list disallow it? Then remove the offending content. > > cheers, > > Rolf Turner > > -- > Technical Editor ANZJS > Department of Statistics > University of Auckland > Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276 ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
