On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 03:42:23AM -0400, Charilaos Skiadas wrote:
> Seeing how there have been three wrong answers so far, I should point
> out that:
>
> 1) This is an FAQ: http://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html#How-
> do-I-convert-factors-to-numeric_003f
Going over the r-help archive, we have seen the misunderstanding
you are pointing out quite often - it clearly is a FREQUENTLY asked
question). In my experience, it is also among the top-five confusions
among students I have introduced R to. And I clearly remember my own
confusion about as.numeric(some_factor) returning the internal encoding
rather than what I had expected, when I started with R.
I guess there is no way to change that behaviour without breaking
existing code, but I feel it would have been much better to have
as.numeric and as.integer do what people expect and have something like
levelencoding(some_factor) for getting the integer representation.
The problem is particularly frustrating as the result of type casting is
inconsistent: as.character does exactly what people's intuition says
(i.e. operate on the levels) while as.numeric does not.
So what is my point? I guess it's my message for all new R-users:
"You are not alone - this has confused all of us in the beginning."
Maybe as.integer and as.numeric should give a warning whenever applied to
a factor?
cu
Philipp
--
Dr. Philipp Pagel
Lehrstuhl für Genomorientierte Bioinformatik
Technische Universität München
Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan
85350 Freising, Germany
http://mips.gsf.de/staff/pagel
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
