On 18 Mar 2015, at 15:11 , Annalisa Orenti <annalisaore...@libero.it> wrote:
> Dear R-Users, > I need to fit a regression by means of S-estimator, but I found an > inconsistency in lqs function in MASS package. > When recalling coefficient estimates two discordant answers are obtained by > coef() function and by $coef object: > As an example I report here the results of fitting regression S-estimator on > stackloss data: > > library(MASS) > Sestim<-lqs(stack.loss ~ Air.Flow + Water.Temp + Acid.Conc., data = > stackloss, > method = "S") > coef(Sestim) > (Intercept) Air.Flow Water.Temp Acid.Conc. > -35.37610619 0.82522124 0.44247788 -0.07964602 > Sestim$coef > Air.Flow Water.Temp Acid.Conc. > -36.92530315 0.84957479 0.43047554 -0.07354065 > > Do you have any suggestions? The immediate reason is that Sestim contains both $coef and $coefficients and coef() extracts the latter. Why this is so escapes me. It looks like it might be a blunder, but the package author isn't usually prone to blundering... -pd > Thank you for your help. > Best regards. > Annalisa > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Office: A 4.23 Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.