On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 05:12:19 PM CJ Davies wrote:
> I am trying to show that the red line ('yaw') in the upper of the two
> plots here;
>
> http://i.imgur.com/N4Xxb4f.png
>
> varies more within the pink sections ('transition 1') than in the light
> blue sections ('real').
>
> I tried to use var.test() however this runs into a problem because
> although the red line doesn't vary much *within* any particular light
> blue section, it does vary a lot *between* light blue sections.
>
> For example, in the light blue section around t=90 the red line
doesn't
> move much & likewise in the light blue section around t=160 the
red line
> doesn't move much. But between these two sections the red line
has moved
> substantially.
>
> So if I simply subset the data according to pink/light blue & then put
> those resultant subsets into var.test(), the answer does not show
the
> relationship that I want it to.
>
> Can anybody shed some light on a sensible method of solving this?
>
Hi CJ,
If your dataset has the transition type coded for each observation:
rotation transition
90 blue
90 blue
115 pink
-10 pink
30 green
...
you could aggregate all the observations within each transition type
and test that.
Jim
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
