Hi
Thanks to all for the inputs. It will also be great to get inputs on the
procedure and the contact person for getting the commercial license on R
Rgds
Pasu
On 19-Sep-2014 2:13 AM, "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/09/2014 2:35 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
>> On Sep 18, 2014, at 4:36 AM, Pasu <pasupat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I would like to know how to use R in our commercial business application
>> > which we plan to host in cloud or deploy on customer's premise.
>> >
>> > 1. Using R and its package, does it enforce that my commercial business
>> > application should be distributed under GPL, as the statistical
>> derivation
>> > (output) by using R will be presented to the end users as part of of our
>> > commercial business application
>> > 2. Whom to contact to get commercial license if required for using R?
>> >
>> > Rgds
>> > Pasupathy
>>
>>
>> You will not get a definitive legal opinion here and my comments below do
>> not represent any formal opinion on the part of any organization.
>>
>> There is nothing preventing you or your company from using R as an end
>> user. There are many of us who use R in commercial settings and in general,
>> the output of a GPL'd application (text or binary) is not considered to be
>> also GPL'd.
>>
>> The subtleties get into the distribution of R (which you seem to plan to
>> do), the nature of any additional functionality/code that you or your
>> company may write/distribute, how that code interacts with R and/or
>> modifies R source code copyrighted by the R Foundation and others. If you
>> distribute R to clients, you will need to make R's source code available to
>> them in some manner along with any modifications to that same code, while
>> preserving appropriate copyrights.
>>
>> A proprietary (closed source) application cannot be licensed under the
>> GPL, but your company's application/code may be forced to be GPL (the so
>> called viral aspect of the GPL) depending upon how your application is
>> implemented as I noted in the prior paragraph. Thus, you may be forced to
>> make your source code available to your clients as well.
>>
>> If you plan to move forward, you should consult with an attorney well
>> educated in software licensing and distribution issues, especially as they
>> pertain to the GPL. The risks are not inconsequential of falling on the
>> wrong side of the GPL.
>>
>> The official R distribution is not available via a commercial or
>> developer license, but there are commercial vendors of R and a Google
>> search will point you in their direction, if desired. However, since their
>> products are founded upon the official R distribution and the GPL, they
>> will have similar issues with respect to any enhancements that they have
>> created and therefore, your concerns do not necessarily go away. They will
>> have also consulted legal counsel on these issues because the viability of
>> their business depends upon it.
>>
>
> I agree with all of that but for one thing: not all distributions are
> built on the GPL'd original. I believe Tibco is selling an independent
> implementation.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
