Hello, And what about submitting your suggestions directly to the package author/maintainer?
And please don't post in HTML. Regards, Pascal On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:13 PM, sagnik chakravarty <sagnik.st...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > I was using your "psych" package for factor analysis and was also comparing > the results with SAS results. I have some suggestions and/or confusions > regarding the fa() function in the package: > > - The fa() function *doesn't account for Heywood cases* (communality > greater than 1) and never ever throws out any error related to that which > other softwares do. This is a serious and common issue in iterative factor > analysis and hence should have been accounted for. > > > - The fa() function doesn't provide "equamax" rotation in its rotation > list and still if you specify "*rotation=equamax*", it will run without > throwing out any error and even mentioning in the result that "equamax" has > been applied. But I have thoroughly compared results from " > *rotation=none*" and "*rotation=equamax*" options and they are exactly > same. *That means fa() is not doing the rotation at all and yet telling > that it is doing that!!* I have even mentioned "*rotation=crap*" option > just to check and surprisingly it ran(without any error) with the result > showing: > > *Factor Analysis using method = gls* > * Call: fa(r = cor_mat, nfactors = 4, n.obs = 69576, rotate = > "crap", fm = "gls")* > > I hope you understand the severity of this bug and hence > request you to correct this. > > - To my sense, there might be some problem with "fm=ml" and "fm=pa" > options since the convergence issue should be with MLE method and not PA > method but while running factor analysis with PA, I am getting the > following warning: > > *maximum iteration exceeded* > * The estimated weights for the factor scores are probably > incorrect. Try a different factor extraction method.* > > If I compare the results of R and SAS,* I am getting > convergence error for MLE in SAS whereas I am getting the same error for PA > in R *!! I am not being able to understand this mismatch. > > - If I call the *loading matrix like efa_pa$loadings, the matrix shown > has many blank cells whereas the final result showing the loadings doesn't > have so* !! > > *Loadings:* > * PA1 PA2 PA3 PA4 * > *Var1 0.401 -0.243* > *Var2 0.336 -0.104 0.710* > *Var3 0.624 0.123 0.170 * > > > - Could you please explain* what the "com" column means* in the output:? > > > * PA1 PA3 PA2 PA4 h2 u2 com* > *Var1 0.44 0.14 -0.03 -0.10 0.22665 0.773 1.3* > *Var2 0.08 0.11 0.02 0.78 0.62951 0.370 1.1* > *Var3 0.62 0.12 0.15 0.14 0.43578 0.564 1.3* > > - Request you to add option for *"equamax" rotation* also if possible. > > > I have come across the above issues until now. Please do correct me if I am > wrong. > > Awaiting your revert which would clear out my confusions, > > Thanks for your valuable time, > > Sagnik > > -- > Regards, > > *SAGNIK CHAKRAVARTY* > > *Mob:* +919972865435 > *Email:* sagnik.st...@gmail.com > sagnik....@gmail.com > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. -- Pascal Oettli Project Scientist JAMSTEC Yokohama, Japan ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.