I am mystified. Your question lacks any context... it is at best off-topic in
R-help. The syntax you show does not seem related to R, and if you were to
discuss AMQP as it relates to R then I suspect you would need to post in
R-devel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Newmiller The ..... ..... Go Live...
DCN:<jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us> Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go...
Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries O.O#. #.O#. with
/Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...1k
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On February 16, 2014 10:04:04 AM PST, "Matwey V. Kornilov"
<matwey.korni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>Is it a good practice to link the channel to the process going to
>consume the messages? I do want to close the channel when my consumer
>crashed, and let the broker to redeliver unacked message.
>
>{ok, Channel} = amqp_connection:open_channel(Connection),
>link(Channel),
>
>Why there is no open_channel_link counterpart, as start and start_link?
>
>This is for case when channel goes down between open_channel and link.
>
>______________________________________________
>R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>PLEASE do read the posting guide
>http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
