On 14.12.2013 17:50, David Winsemius wrote:
On Dec 14, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
David,
how should R interpret "110+"? It cannot be numeric, perhaps you have not recognized the
"+" there?
I specifically included the fragment ofthe much longer file that was throwing
the error. If this behavior doesn't appear flawed to you, Uwe, then am
apparently under the misapprehension that it in the past it would have been
coerced to NA.
It is the behaviour since R-1.7.1 at least, and I have no older versions
installed...
Best,
Uwe
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
