+1
John Kane
Kingston ON Canada
> -----Original Message-----
> From: j...@bitwrit.com.au
> Sent: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 17:16:35 +1000
> To: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] Interpreting the result of a Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney U)
> test
>
> On 10/04/2013 11:34 PM, S Ellison wrote:
>> ...
> >> Got it! I agree it should had been more obvious to me... :)
>> I wouldn't feel too bad about that. I've spent most of the last 25 years
>> discovering the hard way that statistics is very much a field where
>> things are 'obvious' only _after_ you know the answer...
>>
> A fortune ("hindsight") if I ever saw one.
>
> Jim
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
____________________________________________________________
FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and
family!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
