require(rms)
?orm            # ordinal regression model

For a case study see Handouts in http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/CourseBios330

Since you have lost the original values, one part of the case study will not apply: the use of Mean().

Frank
-------------
I have a dataset which has several predictor variables and a dependent variable, "score" (which is numeric). The score for each row is calculated using a formula which uses some of the predictor variables. But, the "score" figures are not explicitly given in the dataset. The scores are only arranged in ascending order, and the ranks of the numbers are given (like 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.; rank 1 means that the particular row had the highest score, 2 means it had the second highest score and so on). So, if the data has 100 rows, the output has ranks from 1 to 100. I don't think it would be proper to treat the output column as a numeric one, since it is an ordinal variable, and the distance (difference in scores) between ranks 1 and 2 may not be the same as that between ranks 2 and 3. However, most R regression models for ordinal regression are made for output such as (high, medium, low), where each level of the output does not necessarily correspond to a unique row. In my case, each output (rank) corresponds to a unique row. So please suggest me what models I could use for this problem. Will treating the output as numeric instead of ordinal be a reasonable approximation? Or will the usual models for ordinal regression work on this dataset as well?

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to