Thanks for your reply, Gert. I was aware of the documentation. Thanks
for your hint. In addition I have found that running
par(mfrow = c(2,2))
par(cex=1)
sequentially also has the desired result.
Cheers
Jannis
On 13.09.2013 19:01, Bert Gunter wrote:
?par documents this behavior. I think if you just initially large cex by
the appropriate amount, that might compensate for it, but I haven't tested
this (I use lattice and grid graphics). Otherwise, as suggested in ?par,
consider ?layout.
Cheers,
Bert
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Jannis <bt_jan...@yahoo.de> wrote:
Dear R users,
if I use par(mfrow=c(3,3)), R automatically changes the value of cex and
even setting cex=1 in the same par() call does not seem to prevent this.
Even though such behavior may be helpful an many cases, I am wondering
whether there is a easy way to switch this off (short of setting cex to a
value that would be 1 if modified by mfrow).
In the end my desire to have the software do what I tell it to do and not
what its programmers think I would want to do was one of the reasons to
move away to R from (in)famous Excel ;-).
Cheers
Jannis
______________________________**________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/**listinfo/r-help<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help>
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/**
posting-guide.html <http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html>
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
