Dear Jari Oksanen,

Thanks a lot for the varpart  R package help.

I preferred Adj. R square as mentioned by Peres-Neto (2006), but there are two facts that let me struggling around with the adj. R square. a) I received an Adj. R. square > 1 for an explanatory matrix (common and individual fraction together; e.g. fraction a+d+f+g) and b) Adj. R. square for "all fractions" is sometimes smaller than the individual fraction. I used scale() for the explanatory variables, vif.cca and forward selection in each explanatory matrix. I am therefore not sure if this finding is really a statistical or data handling problem. Additionally the dependend matrix consists of continuous tree productivity variables. I would very much appreciate if you can give me some hints if I have missed some specific R-varpart mathematical functions explaining this finding.

Thanks a lot
Sibylle


On 23.08.2013, at 11:06, Jari Oksanen wrote:

Sibylle Stöckli <sibylle.stoeckli <at> gmx.ch> writes:


I applied vegan's varpart function to partition the effects of
explanatory matrices. Adj. R square for the unique fraction [a] is
0.25. Does anyone know why the decomposition by hand using rda gives
me a different result for [a] (constrained proportion is 0.32)? I used
cbind() for the conditional fractions, but it should be similar to
condition()?
...
                       Df R.square Adj.R.square Testable
...
[a+b+d+e+f+g] = X1+X2 40  0.64676      0.49318     TRUE
[a+c+d+e+f+g] = X1+X3 38  0.59086      0.42546     TRUE
[b+c+d+e+f+g] = X2+X3 20  0.36936      0.25675     TRUE
[a+b+c+d+e+f+g] = All 49  0.69072      0.50813     TRUE
Individual fractions
[a] = X1 | X2+X3      29               0.25139     TRUE
...

Sibylle,

When you decompose by hand, you probably calculate

X1 | X2+X3 = All - X2+X3, or

0.32136 = 0.69072 - 0.36936,

whereas varpart function in vegan calculates this as

0.25139 = 0.50813 - 0.49318 (with smaller round-off error).

That is, vegan uses column "Adj.R.square", but you used column "R.square"
in your hand calculation.

This is documented in ?varpart with a reference to publications where
this is justified (Peres-Neto et al. 2006, Legendre & Legendre 2012).

Sorry for excessive pruning of your original post: I use gmane to
post and it does not allow appropriate quoting of the original
message.

Cheers, Jari Oksanen

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to