You should seek local statistical help. This list is not the right place to seek what appears to be statistical consulting and, indeed, basic statistical instruction.
-- Bert On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Luis Fernando García Hernández <luysgar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Friends, > > I am new on R so I ask you to excuse me if this question sounds fool. I > want to see if there is a significativa relationship between the mating > (response variable) and several explanatory variables such as individual > number (categorical), leg movemente (continous) and the reuse of > individuals (categorical). My data looks like this > > MatingIDReplicationShaking1M1R1100M1R2140M2R1150M2R2121M3R1140M3R2171M4R1190 > M4R2221M5R1180M5R2161M6R117 > > > > 1 means mating happened, 0 means did not occur. > > I am trying to organize the data to apply a GLMM to the data, but have not > been able to do it.I followed the model proposed by CRawley for binary > response with pseudorreplication but does not wok. The script goes like this > > model2<-lmer(Mating~Replication+(1 ID),family=binomial,method=”PQL”) > > Can somebody tell me what part is wrong and how could I fix it? If you know > a better method, will be really welcomed! > > All the best! > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > -- Bert Gunter Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics Internal Contact Info: Phone: 467-7374 Website: http://pharmadevelopment.roche.com/index/pdb/pdb-functional-groups/pdb-biostatistics/pdb-ncb-home.htm ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
