I'd be very happy to change its name and welcome any input on another name. Zhiyong
________________________________ From: Michael Weylandt <michael.weyla...@gmail.com> Cc: "r-help@r-project.org" <r-help@r-project.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:26 PM Subject: Re: [R] More discussion on R usage statistics Interesting idea but would you be willing to change the name. Twitter, Stackoverflow, and the like use rstats to refer to R itself and confusion seems probable. https://mobile.twitter.com/search?q=%23rstats Michael Dear R users, > >There has been discussion on how to collect R usage statistics before and the >discussion has led to some good results such as >http://neolab.stat.ucla.edu/cranstats/ and http://crantastic.org/. Recently, I >tried to put together a package that allows R users to rate, comment, and ask >questions on R packages within R. A working version is now available on both >github and r-forge. Note that the email feature may not work out as expected >because gmail, used by the package, only allows 500 messages sent per day. > >To install it from R forge, please use >install.packages('rstats', repos="http://r-forge.r-project.org") > >Using github (require the package devtools), >install_github('rstats','johnnyzhz') > >A brief manual of it can be seen at: http://rstats.psychstat.org/rstats.pdf > > >I'd appreciate it that if you can test this and provide feedback on how to >collect and utilize R usage statistics. > >Best, >Zhiyong Zhang > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ >R-help@r-project.org mailing list >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.