On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Henrik Bengtsson <h...@biostat.ucsf.edu> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Knut Krueger <r...@knut-krueger.de> wrote: >> Am 20.04.2013 15:50, schrieb Gabor Grothendieck: >> >>> Note that there is a separate directory for the 64-bit R executables. >> >> Does it make any difference to check and pack the source files iwth 32 or 64 >> bit? >> >>> Also, downloading MinGW should not be needed. Rtools already contains the >>> needed UNIX utilities. >> >> Yes indeed it works better than MinGW >> >> >>> You might want to look into the Windows batch files at >>> http://batchfiles.googlecode.com . >> >> >> At least it would be very helpful for windows user to give the hint to the >> executable rcmd.exe build ... instead of R cmd build ... > > FYI, > > R CMD build ... > > works just fine on Windows (and I'm sure R cmd build ... won't). >
That is correct but if one were using the batchfiles I mentioned then both work. -- Statistics & Software Consulting GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc. tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
