Hi

I'm trying to measure the effect of a policy intervention (Box and Tiao, 1975).
This query has to do with the coding of the model rather than with the 
particulars of my dataset, so I'm not providing the actual dataset (or a 
simulated one) in this case, apart from some general description.

The time series are of length n=34 (annual observations between 1977 and 2010). 
The policy measure was introduced in 2000 and it has been implemented once a 
year ever since.

The variable of interest (VI) is continuous, and I have four continuous 
covariates (CO1-CO4), plus the dummy intervention variable (DUM) which is equal 
to 0 between 1977 and 1999 and equal to 1 since 2000.

I thought of using an ARIMAX model, with the arimax() function in the TSA 
package to fit the transfer function. I'm interested in modelling the 
intervention effect as a step function.

I specified the model thus:


a.       I've checked the ARIMA properties of each series using the 
auto.arima() function (from the 'forecast' package) -the VI was found to best 
fit an ARIMA(0,1,1) model and the first covariate an ARIMA(1,0,0), whereas the 
other covariates were white noise.



b.      To facilitate the specification of the various models  (the different 
model specifications dropped variables or added additional covariates, etc, 
without changing the general structure of the syntax below), I defined the 
following design matrix:



> xreg.1 <-  model.matrix(~CO1+ CO2+ CO3+ CO4)[,2:5]



c.       Following Cryer and Chan (2008, ch. 11, p. 255), I wrote models such 
as this:



> arimax.1 <- arimax(VI, order=c(0,1,1),

+ xtransf=data.frame(xreg.1,dummy1=DUM),

+ transfer=list(c(1,0),c(0,0),c(0,0),c(0,0),c(0,0)))


d.      So, I get estimates for the following coefficients:


ma1;  CO1-AR1;  CO1-MA0;  CO2-MA0;  CO3-MA0;  CO4-MA0;  DUM-MA0

Can you spot any problems with the general modelling approach or in this 
specification?

Many thanks in advance,

José



José Iparraguirre
Chief Economist
Age UK

T 020 303 31482
E jose.iparragui...@ageuk.org.uk<mailto:jose.iparragui...@ageuk.org.uk>
Twitter @jose.iparraguirre@ageuk


Tavis House, 1- 6 Tavistock Square
London, WC1H 9NB
www.ageuk.org.uk<http://www.ageuk.org.uk> | 
ageukblog.org.uk<http://ageukblog.org.uk/> | 
@ageuk<http://twitter.com/ageukpa>campaigns

Wrap Up and Run 10k is back! 

Also, new for 2013 – 2km intergenerational walks at selected venues. So recruit 
a buddy, dust off the trainers and beat the winter blues by 
signing up now:

http://www.ageuk.org.uk/10k

                 Milton Keynes | Oxford | Sheffield | Crystal Palace | Exeter | 
Harewood House, Leeds | 
                                 Tatton Park, Cheshire | Southampton | Coventry



Age UK Improving later life

http://www.ageuk.org.uk


 

-------------------------------
Age UK is a registered charity and company limited by guarantee, (registered 
charity number 1128267, registered company number 6825798). 
Registered office: Tavis House, 1-6 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9NA.

For the purposes of promoting Age UK Insurance, Age UK is an Appointed 
Representative of Age UK Enterprises Limited, Age UK is an Introducer 
Appointed Representative of JLT Benefit Solutions Limited and Simplyhealth 
Access for the purposes of introducing potential annuity and health 
cash plans customers respectively.  Age UK Enterprises Limited, JLT Benefit 
Solutions Limited and Simplyhealth Access are all authorised and 
regulated by the Financial Services Authority. 
------------------------------

This email and any files transmitted with it are confide...{{dropped:31}}

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to