Dear R_help list members!  Iâm studding forest carnivores and I have data on resting site selection and use!  Iâm trying to model the probability that a forest carnivore might have in be located in a tree hollow (1) (the main resting site selected) rather than elsewhere (0) (other resting site types, dens, nests, etc.). The model should be related with several variables such as for instance:  SHRUB_CV â shrub cover; D_RIPARIAN â distance to riparian habitats FOREST_PP â forest habitat (tree availability) proportion in each sampling unit (1 km buffer around each resting site) D_RIP_KM â distance to the nearest riparian habitat.. Day â day of the year⦠ My data consist of a daily resting site monitoring of 21 animals (during the time that each radio-collar battery allowed) ranging from 40-380 daysâ¦The study was conducted in the 2010-12 period⦠So, in the final I got a data base with more than 3300 observation events (an event is an animal present in a resting site each day). Several resting sites were used more than once by the same individual, but some times the same resting site were used by two or more animals (few times I had two animals in the same day and in the same resting)â¦leading to, that for some covariates, the values are the same across animals when they⦠Also, in most of the days I had more than one resting site event because during most of the study I followed more than one animal at the same time⦠Because I was not interest if there is an animal effect on tree hollow probability use, I used animal as random effect in the models. In addition, we assume that an individual from the forest carnivore population will behave more or less the same way concerning tree hollow use. This lead me to the mixed-effects modelling techniques. Additionally, because I get truly non-linear relationship between some of the covariates (e.g. SHRUB_CV) with the response variable it leads me to the gamm option⦠I start the model building procedure by finding firstly the best fixed structure and after the best random effect structure and finally the best model.  I my case my first attempt final model was obtained by:  Model <- gamm4(TREE_01 ~ s(Day) + T_MAX + SHRUB_CV + D_AV5RS_KM + D_RIP_KM + FOREST_PP, random = ~ (1 | fAnimal), method = "REML", control = lmc, family = binomial, data = RSTEMP_01_X2) summary(Model$gam)  Family: binomial Link function: logit Formula: TREE_01 ~ s(Day) + T_MAX + SHRUB_CV + D_AV5RS_KM + D_RIP_KM +    FOREST_PP Parametric coefficients:                               Estimate   Std. Error    z value    Pr(>|z|)   (Intercept)             5.83792    0.91031   6.413   1.43e-10 *** T_MAX               -0.06309   0.02161  -2.919   0.003509 ** SHRUB_CV        -7.72088   0.46859  -16.477  < 2e-16 *** D_AV5RS_KM    1.94569    0.53025    3.669    0.000243 *** D_RIP_KM          4.65035     0.60978     7.626    2.42e-14 *** FOREST_PP         2.09453    0.58465     3.583    0.000340 *** Signif. codes: 0 â***â 0.001 â**â 0.01 â*â 0.05 â.â 0.1 â â 1 Approximate significance of smooth terms:                edf     Ref.df Chi.sq p-value  s(Day)   5.332  5.332   18.57   0.00316 ** Signif. codes: 0 â***â 0.001 â**â 0.01 â*â 0.05 â.â 0.1 â â 1 R-sq.(adj) = 0.541    glmer.ML score = 1117.3 Scale est. = 1        n = 3358  I used the âgamm4â package because it performs better than the âmgcvâ for binomial response variables⦠However, now I have to check for temporal correlations structures since my monitoring programs was in a daily basis it seems, at least, biologically that I would have temporal correlation between days, i.e. the resting site that an animal use in one day is correlated with the one used in the day after⦠I used the formula âacfâ from the ânlmeâ package, I got the temporal autocorrelation plot, and I confirmed that I have correlation, especially in the first 5 days⦠The problems arrived after this, when I try to add some correlation structures in the model I got the following error:  Error in Initialize.corARMA(X[[2L]], ...) : covariate must have unique values within groups for "corARMA" objects for instance⦠ How can I solve this problem, it is because I have the same value for some covariates across the same animal and between animals? If it is? How can I manage that, because my data should allowed for this because it is normal under this ecological data that a animal during their life time use several times the same resting site and some times they are shared between males and females and females and juveniles/sub-adults. Should I have to create a grouping variable that can disentangle the partsâ¦? Should I have to change the random effect partâ¦?  Anyone can help me?  Best regards!  Filipe Carvalho  Filipe Carvalho, MSc, PhD student. Unidade de Biologia da Conservação (UBC) e Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos (CIBIO), Universidade de Ãvora, Casa Cordovil, 2º Andar, Rua Dr. Joaquim Henrique da Fonseca, 7000-890 Ãvora, (PORTUGAL) Telefone: + 351266759350
Filipe Carvalho, MSc, PhD student. Conservation Biology Unit (UBC) and Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources (CIBIO), University of Ãvora, Casa Cordovil, 2º Andar, Rua Dr. Joaquim Henrique da Fonseca, 7000-890 Ãvora, (PORTUGAL) Phone: + 351266759350 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.