On Jan 8, 2013, at 1:31 PM, David Winsemius wrote:
On Jan 8, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Berend Hasselman wrote:
On 08-01-2013, at 22:00, Berend Hasselman <b...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
…...
David implemented the condition by multiplying by x[1]<x[2] which
in a numeric context is 0 when x[1]<x[2] en 1 when x[1]>=x[2].
OOPS!! Reverse the 0 and the 1 in that sentence (TRUE becomes 1 and
FALSE becomes 0)
I didn't worry about which direction was used for the inequality in
this case because of consideration of symmetry. (Thinking about it
now, I still think I managed to choose the correct direction.)
Obviously such a cavalier attitude should not be carried over to the
general situation.
I hit the send button by mistake. (I originally misread Berend's
correction.) I'm only posting this to make clear that it was myself,
and not Berend, that I was accusing of having been cavalier.
--
David Winsemius, MD
Alameda, CA, USA
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
