On Nov 6, 2012, at 22:16 , Brian Diggs wrote:
> On 11/2/2012 11:11 AM, Ni, Shenghua wrote:
>>> r<-c(1,1,9,1,1,1)
>>> col_no<-cut(r,c(0,2,3,6,8,10,100))
>>> levels(col_no)<-c("<2%","2-4%","4-6%","6-8%","8-10%",">10%")
>>> col_no
>> [1] <2% <2% 8-10% <2% <2% <2%
>> Levels: <2% 2-4% 4-6% 6-8% 8-10% >10%
>
> Yes.
>
> (Or, I get the same output from this code. What is the question?)
>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> And herein may lie the problem...
>
Probably not. There's an original question from December 14, 2010...
It's the sort of thing Nabble and similar interfaces tend to generate: Replies
to ancient posts without any indication of context. For once, though, it wasn't
actually Nabble.
Or maybe it just got stuck in the outbox for almost two years...?
--
Peter Dalgaard, Professor,
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
