You are right, those look suspicious. What version of R and of the coxme package are you
running? Later version of coxme use multiple starting estimates due to precisely this
kind of problem.
Also, when the true MLE is variance=0 the program purposely never quite gets there, in
order to avoid log(0). Compare the log-lik to a fixed effects model with those covariates.
I can't do more than guess without a reproducable example.
Terry Therneau
On 10/08/2012 05:00 AM, r-help-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
Dear R users,
I'm using the function coxme of the package coxme in order to build Cox
models with complex random effects. Unfortunately, I sometimes get
surprising estimations of the variances of the random effects.
I ran models with different fixed covariates but always with the same 3
random effects defined by the argument
varlist=coxmeMlist(list(mat1,mat2,mat3), rescale = F, pdcheck = F,
positive=F). I get a few times exactly the same estimations of the
parameters of the random effects whereas the fixed effects of the models
are different:
Random effects
Group Variable Std Dev Variance
idp Vmat.1 0.10000000 0.01000000
Vmat.2 0.02236068 0.00050000
Vmat.3 0.02449490 0.00060000
The variances are round figures, so I have the feeling that the algorithm
didn't succeed in fitting the model.
Has anyone ever faced to this problem?
Thanks,
Hugo
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
