> > Thanks to R, the internet and pretentious, semi-literate public
> > servants around the world, there probably is now.
> >
> Wait a minute now. Perhaps it's some recursive compensation scheme/
>
Indeed, perhaps the general remark might be reconsidered. As jane Austen said,
"Where any one body of educated men, of whatever denomination, are condemned
indiscriminately, there must be a deficiency of information".
But in this case I think someone just messed up 'recompense' and 'compensate'.
Or possibly just messed up.
Of course this rereconsideration of recompensation would have to be
rerereconsidered if further information came to light.
Good luck with the headache.
*******************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use...{{dropped:8}}
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
