If you type improveProb at the command line you'll see all the code, which is quite simple. I'm glad you are not attempting to classify risk as this is almost always futile.
Frank Svingen, Gard Frodahl wrote > > Dear Sirs. > > I am working with the R packages Hmisc and PredictABEL to make NRI > estimates from my Cox models with and without a specific biomarker. > According to Pencina et al (Statistics in Medicine 2010, DOI: > 0.1002/sim.4085 ), a continuous/non-categorical NRI (NRI>0) is to be used > when there are no obvious reason to categorize risk, such as the risk of > future cardiovascular events in patients with established cardiovascular > disease. > > My question is therefore: Which value(s) are to be used in the calculation > of continuous NRI from the output in Hmisc or in PredictABEL? Does > continuous NRI equal total NRI in the output? > > > > Yours sincerely > > Gard Frodahl T. Svingen > PhD student > the University of Bergen > Bergen, Norway > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@ mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > ----- Frank Harrell Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Hmisc-improveProb-and-PredictABEL-reclassification-function-and-continuous-NRI-tp4630259p4638347.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
