This has always been how the $ operator has worked. See ?"[[", and use that
operator directly if you want exact matching.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Newmiller The ..... ..... Go Live...
DCN:<jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us> Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go...
Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries O.O#. #.O#. with
/Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...1k
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
knallg...@gmx.com wrote:
>Hello there,
>
>I just upgraded to R 2.15 (from R 2.12) on a Windows XP machine and
>noticed some puzzling behaviour (that in my opinion did not exist in R
>2.12).
>
>It is possible now to call objects without spelling out the full object
>name. R now seems to use that (unique) object which shares the same
>beginning of the called object, even though the originally called
>object might not even exist.
>
>This is quite awkwardly described, but perhaps you know what I'm
>talking about?
>
>Let's say I'm using the Mroz data supplied with the car package:
>
>require(car)
>data(Mroz)
>
>there is no variable called "w" in that dataframe, but calling
>
>summary(Mroz$w) #### Mroz$w does not exist
>
>does not return any error but instead gives the same result as
>
>summary(Mroz$wc) ##### exists in Mroz
>
>
>I find this behaviour *very* undesirable. Is there any way to switch it
>off?
>
>Best,
>Irene
>
>______________________________________________
>R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>PLEASE do read the posting guide
>http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
