On May 16, 2012, at 5:08 PM, Damjan Krstajic wrote:
Dear all,
I am confused with the behaviour of survfit with newdata option.
Yes. It has the same behavior as any other newdata/predict from
regression. You need to supply a dataframe with the same names as in
the original formula. Doesn't look as though that strategy is being
followed. The name of the column needs to be 'trainX' since that was
what was its name on the RHS of hte formula, and you may want to
specify times. If you fail to follow those rules, the function falls
back on offering estimates from the original data.
I am using the latest version R-2-15-0. In the simple example below
I am building a coxph model on 90 patients and trying to predict 10
patients. Unfortunately the survival curve at the end is for 90
patients.
As is proper with a malformed newdata argument.
Could somebody please from the survival package confirm that this
behaviour is as expected or not - because I cannot find a way of
using 'newdata' with really new data. Thanks in advance. DK
x<-matrix(rnorm(100*20),100,20)
time<-runif(100,min=0,max=7)
status<-sample(c(0,1), 100, replace = TRUE)
trainX<-x[11:100,]
trainTime<-time[11:100]
trainStatus<-status[11:100]
testX<-x[1:10,]
coxph.model<-
coxph(Surv(trainTime,trainStatus)~ trainX)
sfit<- survfit(coxph.model,newdata=data.frame(testX))
dim(sfit$surv)
[1] 90 90
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
David Winsemius, MD
West Hartford, CT
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
